Talk:One:Antarctic Superposition: Difference between revisions
From MLexWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Additional Links== | ==Additional Links== | ||
Links to others' Phantoms: | |||
* [[One:Batavia Excession]] | * [[One:Batavia Excession]] | ||
* [[One:Excessions]] | * [[One:Excessions]] | ||
Revision as of 07:50, 8 September 2012
Article Metadata
{{#ifeq: {{{SourceArt}}} | N/A | |
}}
| Author: | Alt Melis |
| First Linked By: | N/A |
| Turn Link Created: | N/A |
| Article that Created this Link: | Not provided |
| Required Links | |
|---|---|
| Phantom Links | |
| Climatological Flux (FL) | |
| Galbraith Dig (FL) | |
| Article Link | |
| No link | |
| Other Data | |
| Word Count | Not given |
Turn A articles cannot have any first linked data and have no back link requirement.
Additional Links
Links to others' Phantoms:
Discussion
The most common explanations I have heard for the Antarctic Superposition is that it was in fact caused by the Tertiary Excession. I greatly respect Alt Melis' work here (I agree wholeheartedly with the theory of two distinct regions within Dinosaur Valley, for example), and I wonder if the scholar might be able to shed more light on the suggestion that the AS may not be directly linked with Batavia.
Prof. Reinhold Sanger 12:20, 20 August 2012 (PDT)
- Alt Melis frequently uses "between" in an inclusive sense, and did not at this time want to take a stand between the Tertiarian, Quaternarian, and Seperate-Eventian sides of that particular 'controversy'.
- --The lead research assistant of Alt Melis 13:45, 20 August 2012 (PDT)
- A wise and diplomatic stance, indeed.
- Prof. Reinhold Sanger 18:16, 20 August 2012 (PDT)
