User:Morwenna Celeste: Difference between revisions
From MLexWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "The personal life of Morwenna Celeste is known to us primarily though her letters to Suor Manda Antando. These writings tend to career wildly from the earthy to the esoteric, of...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Suor maria celeste.jpg|200px|thumb|left|Portrait believed to be of Morwenna Celeste]] | |||
The scholarly work attributed her, by contrast, is widely regarded to be a tedious assemblage of minute trivia | The personal life of Morwenna Celeste is known to us primarily though her letters to Suor Manda Antando. These writings tend to career wildly from the earthy to the esoteric, often without paragraph breaks and usually with only vague nods in the direction of proper punctuation. However, the patient reader is rewarded with keenly observed and lively depictions of natural phenomena interspersed with wry glimpses of daily life. | ||
The scholarly work attributed her, by contrast, is widely regarded to be a tedious assemblage of minute trivia, forever plagued with questions of fidelity. | |||
== Select Biblography == | |||
*[[One:The Adumbration of Byxs|The Adumbration of Byxs]] | |||
*[[One:Bantu Brothers|Bantu Brothers]] | |||
*[[One:Computation Gang|Computation Gang]] | |||
*[[One:Drongo (Dicrurus prolificus)|Drongo]] | |||
*[[One:Echs Ess Yun|Echs Ess Yun]] | |||
*[[One:Finches|Finches]] | |||
*[[One:InfoArchologies|InfoArchologies]] | |||
*[[One:Kraker Metgezel|Kraker Metgezel]] | |||
*[[One:Lintar-Ratnil|Lintar-Ratnil]] | |||
*[[One:Mt. Jezebel|Mt. Jezebel]] | |||
[[Category:What came after]] | |||
[[Category:What came after/Characters]] | |||
Latest revision as of 10:12, 31 December 2012
The personal life of Morwenna Celeste is known to us primarily though her letters to Suor Manda Antando. These writings tend to career wildly from the earthy to the esoteric, often without paragraph breaks and usually with only vague nods in the direction of proper punctuation. However, the patient reader is rewarded with keenly observed and lively depictions of natural phenomena interspersed with wry glimpses of daily life.
The scholarly work attributed her, by contrast, is widely regarded to be a tedious assemblage of minute trivia, forever plagued with questions of fidelity.
