Talk:One:Antarctic Superposition: Difference between revisions
From MLexWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[User:Prof. Reinhold Sanger|Prof. Reinhold Sanger]] 12:20, 20 August 2012 (PDT) | [[User:Prof. Reinhold Sanger|Prof. Reinhold Sanger]] 12:20, 20 August 2012 (PDT) | ||
Alt Melis frequently uses "between" in an inclusive sense, and did not at this time want to take a stand between the Tertiarian, Quaternarian, and Seperate-Eventian sides of that particular 'controversy'. | :Alt Melis frequently uses "between" in an inclusive sense, and did not at this time want to take a stand between the Tertiarian, Quaternarian, and Seperate-Eventian sides of that particular 'controversy'. | ||
--The lead research assistant of [[User:Alt Melis|Alt Melis]] 13:45, 20 August 2012 (PDT) | :--The lead research assistant of [[User:Alt Melis|Alt Melis]] 13:45, 20 August 2012 (PDT) | ||
::A wise and diplomatic stance, indeed. | |||
::[[User:Prof. Reinhold Sanger|Prof. Reinhold Sanger]] 18:16, 20 August 2012 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:16, 20 August 2012
The most common explanations I have heard for the Antarctic Superposition is that it was in fact caused by the Tertiary Excession. I greatly respect Alt Melis' work here (I agree wholeheartedly with the theory of two distinct regions within Dinosaur Valley, for example), and I wonder if the scholar might be able to shed more light on the suggestion that the AS may not be directly linked with Batavia.
Prof. Reinhold Sanger 12:20, 20 August 2012 (PDT)
- Alt Melis frequently uses "between" in an inclusive sense, and did not at this time want to take a stand between the Tertiarian, Quaternarian, and Seperate-Eventian sides of that particular 'controversy'.
- --The lead research assistant of Alt Melis 13:45, 20 August 2012 (PDT)
- A wise and diplomatic stance, indeed.
- Prof. Reinhold Sanger 18:16, 20 August 2012 (PDT)
