One:Degeneration Theory - Revision history

Otter Jenkins at 19:26, 30 September 2012

2012-09-30T19:26:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:26, 30 September 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:
	*[[One:Primary Excession\|Primary Excession]]		*[[One:Primary Excession\|Primary Excession]]

	[[Category:~~WCA-Submissions~~]]		[[Category:What came after]]
			[[Category:What came after/Turn D]]

Prof. Reinhold Sanger at 16:52, 26 September 2012

2012-09-26T16:52:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:52, 26 September 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:
	*[[One:Adda Krazh\|Adda Krazh]]		*[[One:Adda Krazh\|Adda Krazh]]
	*[[One:Coba, Mycinea\|Coba, Mycinea]]		*[[One:Coba, Mycinea\|Coba, Mycinea]]
			*[[One:Cerulean Dimension\|Cerulean Dimension]]
	*<u>[[One:Echs Ess Yun\|Echs Ess Yun]]</u> (FL)		*<u>[[One:Echs Ess Yun\|Echs Ess Yun]]</u> (FL)
	*[[One:Excessions\|Excessions]]		*[[One:Excessions\|Excessions]]

Prof. Reinhold Sanger at 13:40, 26 September 2012

2012-09-26T13:40:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:40, 26 September 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Also known as "The Watchmaker's Lament" or the "Spent Universe Model", '''Degeneration Theory''' holds that the [[One:Excessions\|Excessions]] (and related microexcessions) are a natural phenomenon due to the "winding down" of time, causality, and logic. Like an analog clock that has not been wound in some time, proponents of Degeneration Theory say, our observable Universe is failing to adequately measure time and its effects.		Also known as "The Watchmaker's Lament" or the "Spent Universe Model", '''Degeneration Theory''' holds that the [[One:Excessions\|Excessions]] (and related microexcessions) are a natural phenomenon due to the "winding down" of time, causality, and logic. Like an analog clock that has not been wound in some time, proponents of Degeneration Theory say, our observable Universe is failing to adequately measure time and its effects.

	First ~~proposed~~ in 19 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]] by [[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Eustace Jenkins]] and [[One:Coba, Mycinea\|Dr. Mycinea Coba]] while the two were still Apprentice Scholars at the [[One:Polished Mirror Institute\|Polished Mirror Institute]], the Degeneration Theory offered a relatively simplistic view of both the proximate and indirect results of [[One:Primary Excession\|The Event]], and provided a smattering of evidence to support a claim that the Excessions were an unavoidable and natural phenomenon. As further research and evidence cast doubts on the validity of the theory, the two authors suffered a significant falling out, with Ms. Jenkins turning her attentions towards her [[One:Ghost Partners\|Ghost Partners]] and her artwork. Her magnum opus, <u>[[One:Echs Ess Yun\|Echs Ess Yun]]</u>, was briefly considered a "proof" of Degeneration Theory, though it was later determined that this proof was only applicable within the [[One:Cerulean Dimension\|Cerulean Dimension]], and did not shed significant light on what occurred in the Greater Dimensions.		First developed in 19 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]] by [[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Eustace Jenkins]] and [[One:Coba, Mycinea\|Dr. Mycinea Coba]] while the two were still Apprentice Scholars at the [[One:Polished Mirror Institute\|Polished Mirror Institute]], the Degeneration Theory offered a relatively simplistic view of both the proximate and indirect results of [[One:Primary Excession\|The Event]], and provided a smattering of evidence to support a claim that the Excessions were an unavoidable and natural phenomenon. As further research and evidence cast doubts on the validity of the theory, the two authors suffered a significant falling out, with Ms. Jenkins turning her attentions towards her [[One:Ghost Partners\|Ghost Partners]] and her artwork. Her magnum opus, <u>[[One:Echs Ess Yun\|Echs Ess Yun]]</u>, was briefly considered a "proof" of Degeneration Theory, though it was later determined that this proof was only applicable within the [[One:Cerulean Dimension\|Cerulean Dimension]], and did not shed significant light on what occurred in the Greater Dimensions.

	For many years following their split, Dr. Coba was out of the public eye, and did not publish again until 189 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]], when e burst back on the academic scene with the self-publication of <u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>. It is not clear how e has had such a long lifespan, and the typically forthright Dr. Coba uncharacteristically refuses to answer questions about eir age.		For many years following their split, Dr. Coba was out of the public eye, and did not publish again until 189 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]], when e burst back on the academic scene with the self-publication of <u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>. It is not clear how e has had such a long lifespan, and the typically forthright Dr. Coba uncharacteristically refuses to answer questions about eir age.

Prof. Reinhold Sanger: Added second FL

2012-09-26T13:01:05Z

Added second FL

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:01, 26 September 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Also known as "The Watchmaker's Lament" or the "Spent Universe Model", '''Degeneration Theory''' holds that the [[One:Excessions\|Excessions]] (and related microexcessions) are a natural phenomenon due to the "winding down" of time, causality, and logic. Like an analog clock that has not been wound in some time, proponents of Degeneration Theory say, our observable Universe is failing to adequately measure time and its effects.		Also known as "The Watchmaker's Lament" or the "Spent Universe Model", '''Degeneration Theory''' holds that the [[One:Excessions\|Excessions]] (and related microexcessions) are a natural phenomenon due to the "winding down" of time, causality, and logic. Like an analog clock that has not been wound in some time, proponents of Degeneration Theory say, our observable Universe is failing to adequately measure time and its effects.

	First proposed in 19 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]] by [[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Eustace Jenkins]] and [[One:Coba, Mycinea\|Dr. Mycinea Coba]], the Degeneration Theory offered a relatively simplistic view of both the proximate and indirect results of [[One:Primary Excession\|The Event]], and provided a smattering of evidence to support a claim that the Excessions were an unavoidable and natural phenomenon. As further research and evidence cast doubts on the validity of the theory, the two authors suffered a significant falling out, with Ms. Jenkins turning her attentions towards her [[One:Ghost Partners\|Ghost Partners]] and her artwork. Her magnum opus, <u>[[One:Echs Ess Yun\|Echs Ess Yun]]</u>, was briefly considered a "proof" of Degeneration Theory, though it was later determined that this proof was only applicable within the [[One:Cerulean Dimension\|Cerulean Dimension]], and did not shed significant light on what occurred in the Greater Dimensions.		First proposed in 19 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]] by [[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Eustace Jenkins]] and [[One:Coba, Mycinea\|Dr. Mycinea Coba]] while the two were still Apprentice Scholars at the [[One:Polished Mirror Institute\|Polished Mirror Institute]], the Degeneration Theory offered a relatively simplistic view of both the proximate and indirect results of [[One:Primary Excession\|The Event]], and provided a smattering of evidence to support a claim that the Excessions were an unavoidable and natural phenomenon. As further research and evidence cast doubts on the validity of the theory, the two authors suffered a significant falling out, with Ms. Jenkins turning her attentions towards her [[One:Ghost Partners\|Ghost Partners]] and her artwork. Her magnum opus, <u>[[One:Echs Ess Yun\|Echs Ess Yun]]</u>, was briefly considered a "proof" of Degeneration Theory, though it was later determined that this proof was only applicable within the [[One:Cerulean Dimension\|Cerulean Dimension]], and did not shed significant light on what occurred in the Greater Dimensions.

	For many years following their split, Dr. Coba was out of the public eye, and did not publish again until 189 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]], when e burst back on the academic scene with the self-publication of <u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>. It is not clear how e has had such a long lifespan, and the typically forthright Dr. Coba uncharacteristically refuses to answer questions about eir age.		For many years following their split, Dr. Coba was out of the public eye, and did not publish again until 189 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]], when e burst back on the academic scene with the self-publication of <u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>. It is not clear how e has had such a long lifespan, and the typically forthright Dr. Coba uncharacteristically refuses to answer questions about eir age.
Line 13:		Line 13:
	*<u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>		*<u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>
	*[[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Jenkins, Eustace]]		*[[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Jenkins, Eustace]]
			*[[One:Polished Mirror Institute\|Polished Mirror Institute]] (FL)
	*[[One:Primary Excession\|Primary Excession]]		*[[One:Primary Excession\|Primary Excession]]

	[[Category:WCA-Submissions]]		[[Category:WCA-Submissions]]

Prof. Reinhold Sanger at 12:53, 26 September 2012

2012-09-26T12:53:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:53, 26 September 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:
	*[[One:Ghost Partners\|Ghost Partners]]		*[[One:Ghost Partners\|Ghost Partners]]
	*<u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>		*<u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>
	*[[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Jenkins, Eustace]] ~~(FL)~~		*[[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Jenkins, Eustace]]
	*[[One:Primary Excession\|Primary Excession]]		*[[One:Primary Excession\|Primary Excession]]

	[[Category:WCA-Submissions]]		[[Category:WCA-Submissions]]

Prof. Reinhold Sanger at 12:45, 26 September 2012

2012-09-26T12:45:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:45, 26 September 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~I shall relish~~ the ~~chance~~ to ~~debunk this poppycock~~.		Also known as "The Watchmaker's Lament" or the "Spent Universe Model", '''Degeneration Theory''' holds that the [[One:Excessions\|Excessions]] (and related microexcessions) are a natural phenomenon due to the "winding down" of time, causality, and logic. Like an analog clock that has not been wound in some time, proponents of Degeneration Theory say, our observable Universe is failing to adequately measure time and its effects.

	[[~~User~~:~~Prof~~. ~~Reinhold Sanger~~\|~~Prof~~. ~~Reinhold Sanger~~]] 10:25, ~~24 September 2012~~ (~~PDT~~)		First proposed in 19 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]] by [[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Eustace Jenkins]] and [[One:Coba, Mycinea\|Dr. Mycinea Coba]], the Degeneration Theory offered a relatively simplistic view of both the proximate and indirect results of [[One:Primary Excession\|The Event]], and provided a smattering of evidence to support a claim that the Excessions were an unavoidable and natural phenomenon. As further research and evidence cast doubts on the validity of the theory, the two authors suffered a significant falling out, with Ms. Jenkins turning her attentions towards her [[One:Ghost Partners\|Ghost Partners]] and her artwork. Her magnum opus, <u>[[One:Echs Ess Yun\|Echs Ess Yun]]</u>, was briefly considered a "proof" of Degeneration Theory, though it was later determined that this proof was only applicable within the [[One:Cerulean Dimension\|Cerulean Dimension]], and did not shed significant light on what occurred in the Greater Dimensions.

			For many years following their split, Dr. Coba was out of the public eye, and did not publish again until 189 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]], when e burst back on the academic scene with the self-publication of <u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>. It is not clear how e has had such a long lifespan, and the typically forthright Dr. Coba uncharacteristically refuses to answer questions about eir age.

			==Citations==
			*[[One:Adda Krazh\|Adda Krazh]]
			*[[One:Coba, Mycinea\|Coba, Mycinea]]
			*<u>[[One:Echs Ess Yun\|Echs Ess Yun]]</u> (FL)
			*[[One:Excessions\|Excessions]]
			*[[One:Ghost Partners\|Ghost Partners]]
			*<u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>
			*[[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Jenkins, Eustace]] (FL)
			*[[One:Primary Excession\|Primary Excession]]

			[[Category:WCA-Submissions]]

Prof. Reinhold Sanger: Created page with "I shall relish the chance to debunk this poppycock. ~~~~"

2012-09-24T17:25:08Z

Created page with "I shall relish the chance to debunk this poppycock. ~~~~"

New page

I shall relish the chance to debunk this poppycock.

[[User:Prof. Reinhold Sanger|Prof. Reinhold Sanger]] 10:25, 24 September 2012 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:52, 26 September 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:
	*[[One:Adda Krazh\|Adda Krazh]]		*[[One:Adda Krazh\|Adda Krazh]]
	*[[One:Coba, Mycinea\|Coba, Mycinea]]		*[[One:Coba, Mycinea\|Coba, Mycinea]]
			*[[One:Cerulean Dimension\|Cerulean Dimension]]
	*<u>[[One:Echs Ess Yun\|Echs Ess Yun]]</u> (FL)		*<u>[[One:Echs Ess Yun\|Echs Ess Yun]]</u> (FL)
	*[[One:Excessions\|Excessions]]		*[[One:Excessions\|Excessions]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:40, 26 September 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Also known as "The Watchmaker's Lament" or the "Spent Universe Model", '''Degeneration Theory''' holds that the [[One:Excessions\|Excessions]] (and related microexcessions) are a natural phenomenon due to the "winding down" of time, causality, and logic. Like an analog clock that has not been wound in some time, proponents of Degeneration Theory say, our observable Universe is failing to adequately measure time and its effects.		Also known as "The Watchmaker's Lament" or the "Spent Universe Model", '''Degeneration Theory''' holds that the [[One:Excessions\|Excessions]] (and related microexcessions) are a natural phenomenon due to the "winding down" of time, causality, and logic. Like an analog clock that has not been wound in some time, proponents of Degeneration Theory say, our observable Universe is failing to adequately measure time and its effects.

	First ~~proposed~~ in 19 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]] by [[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Eustace Jenkins]] and [[One:Coba, Mycinea\|Dr. Mycinea Coba]] while the two were still Apprentice Scholars at the [[One:Polished Mirror Institute\|Polished Mirror Institute]], the Degeneration Theory offered a relatively simplistic view of both the proximate and indirect results of [[One:Primary Excession\|The Event]], and provided a smattering of evidence to support a claim that the Excessions were an unavoidable and natural phenomenon. As further research and evidence cast doubts on the validity of the theory, the two authors suffered a significant falling out, with Ms. Jenkins turning her attentions towards her [[One:Ghost Partners\|Ghost Partners]] and her artwork. Her magnum opus, <u>[[One:Echs Ess Yun\|Echs Ess Yun]]</u>, was briefly considered a "proof" of Degeneration Theory, though it was later determined that this proof was only applicable within the [[One:Cerulean Dimension\|Cerulean Dimension]], and did not shed significant light on what occurred in the Greater Dimensions.		First developed in 19 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]] by [[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Eustace Jenkins]] and [[One:Coba, Mycinea\|Dr. Mycinea Coba]] while the two were still Apprentice Scholars at the [[One:Polished Mirror Institute\|Polished Mirror Institute]], the Degeneration Theory offered a relatively simplistic view of both the proximate and indirect results of [[One:Primary Excession\|The Event]], and provided a smattering of evidence to support a claim that the Excessions were an unavoidable and natural phenomenon. As further research and evidence cast doubts on the validity of the theory, the two authors suffered a significant falling out, with Ms. Jenkins turning her attentions towards her [[One:Ghost Partners\|Ghost Partners]] and her artwork. Her magnum opus, <u>[[One:Echs Ess Yun\|Echs Ess Yun]]</u>, was briefly considered a "proof" of Degeneration Theory, though it was later determined that this proof was only applicable within the [[One:Cerulean Dimension\|Cerulean Dimension]], and did not shed significant light on what occurred in the Greater Dimensions.

	For many years following their split, Dr. Coba was out of the public eye, and did not publish again until 189 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]], when e burst back on the academic scene with the self-publication of <u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>. It is not clear how e has had such a long lifespan, and the typically forthright Dr. Coba uncharacteristically refuses to answer questions about eir age.		For many years following their split, Dr. Coba was out of the public eye, and did not publish again until 189 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]], when e burst back on the academic scene with the self-publication of <u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>. It is not clear how e has had such a long lifespan, and the typically forthright Dr. Coba uncharacteristically refuses to answer questions about eir age.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:01, 26 September 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Also known as "The Watchmaker's Lament" or the "Spent Universe Model", '''Degeneration Theory''' holds that the [[One:Excessions\|Excessions]] (and related microexcessions) are a natural phenomenon due to the "winding down" of time, causality, and logic. Like an analog clock that has not been wound in some time, proponents of Degeneration Theory say, our observable Universe is failing to adequately measure time and its effects.		Also known as "The Watchmaker's Lament" or the "Spent Universe Model", '''Degeneration Theory''' holds that the [[One:Excessions\|Excessions]] (and related microexcessions) are a natural phenomenon due to the "winding down" of time, causality, and logic. Like an analog clock that has not been wound in some time, proponents of Degeneration Theory say, our observable Universe is failing to adequately measure time and its effects.

	First proposed in 19 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]] by [[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Eustace Jenkins]] and [[One:Coba, Mycinea\|Dr. Mycinea Coba]], the Degeneration Theory offered a relatively simplistic view of both the proximate and indirect results of [[One:Primary Excession\|The Event]], and provided a smattering of evidence to support a claim that the Excessions were an unavoidable and natural phenomenon. As further research and evidence cast doubts on the validity of the theory, the two authors suffered a significant falling out, with Ms. Jenkins turning her attentions towards her [[One:Ghost Partners\|Ghost Partners]] and her artwork. Her magnum opus, <u>[[One:Echs Ess Yun\|Echs Ess Yun]]</u>, was briefly considered a "proof" of Degeneration Theory, though it was later determined that this proof was only applicable within the [[One:Cerulean Dimension\|Cerulean Dimension]], and did not shed significant light on what occurred in the Greater Dimensions.		First proposed in 19 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]] by [[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Eustace Jenkins]] and [[One:Coba, Mycinea\|Dr. Mycinea Coba]] while the two were still Apprentice Scholars at the [[One:Polished Mirror Institute\|Polished Mirror Institute]], the Degeneration Theory offered a relatively simplistic view of both the proximate and indirect results of [[One:Primary Excession\|The Event]], and provided a smattering of evidence to support a claim that the Excessions were an unavoidable and natural phenomenon. As further research and evidence cast doubts on the validity of the theory, the two authors suffered a significant falling out, with Ms. Jenkins turning her attentions towards her [[One:Ghost Partners\|Ghost Partners]] and her artwork. Her magnum opus, <u>[[One:Echs Ess Yun\|Echs Ess Yun]]</u>, was briefly considered a "proof" of Degeneration Theory, though it was later determined that this proof was only applicable within the [[One:Cerulean Dimension\|Cerulean Dimension]], and did not shed significant light on what occurred in the Greater Dimensions.

	For many years following their split, Dr. Coba was out of the public eye, and did not publish again until 189 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]], when e burst back on the academic scene with the self-publication of <u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>. It is not clear how e has had such a long lifespan, and the typically forthright Dr. Coba uncharacteristically refuses to answer questions about eir age.		For many years following their split, Dr. Coba was out of the public eye, and did not publish again until 189 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]], when e burst back on the academic scene with the self-publication of <u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>. It is not clear how e has had such a long lifespan, and the typically forthright Dr. Coba uncharacteristically refuses to answer questions about eir age.
Line 13:		Line 13:
	*<u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>		*<u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>
	*[[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Jenkins, Eustace]]		*[[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Jenkins, Eustace]]
			*[[One:Polished Mirror Institute\|Polished Mirror Institute]] (FL)
	*[[One:Primary Excession\|Primary Excession]]		*[[One:Primary Excession\|Primary Excession]]

	[[Category:WCA-Submissions]]		[[Category:WCA-Submissions]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:53, 26 September 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:
	*[[One:Ghost Partners\|Ghost Partners]]		*[[One:Ghost Partners\|Ghost Partners]]
	*<u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>		*<u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>
	*[[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Jenkins, Eustace]] ~~(FL)~~		*[[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Jenkins, Eustace]]
	*[[One:Primary Excession\|Primary Excession]]		*[[One:Primary Excession\|Primary Excession]]

	[[Category:WCA-Submissions]]		[[Category:WCA-Submissions]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:45, 26 September 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~I shall relish~~ the ~~chance~~ to ~~debunk this poppycock~~.		Also known as "The Watchmaker's Lament" or the "Spent Universe Model", '''Degeneration Theory''' holds that the [[One:Excessions\|Excessions]] (and related microexcessions) are a natural phenomenon due to the "winding down" of time, causality, and logic. Like an analog clock that has not been wound in some time, proponents of Degeneration Theory say, our observable Universe is failing to adequately measure time and its effects.

	[[~~User~~:~~Prof~~. ~~Reinhold Sanger~~\|~~Prof~~. ~~Reinhold Sanger~~]] 10:25, ~~24 September 2012~~ (~~PDT~~)		First proposed in 19 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]] by [[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Eustace Jenkins]] and [[One:Coba, Mycinea\|Dr. Mycinea Coba]], the Degeneration Theory offered a relatively simplistic view of both the proximate and indirect results of [[One:Primary Excession\|The Event]], and provided a smattering of evidence to support a claim that the Excessions were an unavoidable and natural phenomenon. As further research and evidence cast doubts on the validity of the theory, the two authors suffered a significant falling out, with Ms. Jenkins turning her attentions towards her [[One:Ghost Partners\|Ghost Partners]] and her artwork. Her magnum opus, <u>[[One:Echs Ess Yun\|Echs Ess Yun]]</u>, was briefly considered a "proof" of Degeneration Theory, though it was later determined that this proof was only applicable within the [[One:Cerulean Dimension\|Cerulean Dimension]], and did not shed significant light on what occurred in the Greater Dimensions.

			For many years following their split, Dr. Coba was out of the public eye, and did not publish again until 189 [[One:Adda Krazh\|AK]], when e burst back on the academic scene with the self-publication of <u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>. It is not clear how e has had such a long lifespan, and the typically forthright Dr. Coba uncharacteristically refuses to answer questions about eir age.

			==Citations==
			*[[One:Adda Krazh\|Adda Krazh]]
			*[[One:Coba, Mycinea\|Coba, Mycinea]]
			*<u>[[One:Echs Ess Yun\|Echs Ess Yun]]</u> (FL)
			*[[One:Excessions\|Excessions]]
			*[[One:Ghost Partners\|Ghost Partners]]
			*<u>[[One:Indigo Theory\|Indigo Theory]]</u>
			*[[One:Jenkins, Eustace\|Jenkins, Eustace]] (FL)
			*[[One:Primary Excession\|Primary Excession]]

			[[Category:WCA-Submissions]]