Talk:One:Antarctic Superposition: Difference between revisions
From MLexWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "The most common explanations I have heard for the Antarctic Superposition is that it was in fact ''caused by'' the Tertiary Excession. I greatly respect Alt Melis' work here (I a...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{SimpleBox1-One | |||
|Auth=Alt Melis | |||
|FL=N/A | |||
|TC=N/A | |||
|Dib=August 18, 2012 11:18 | |||
|Sub=August 20, 2012 10:16 | |||
|Acc=September 8, 2012 10:45 | |||
|Phant1=Climatological Flux | |||
|P1FL='''(FL)''' | |||
|Phant2=Galbraith Dig | |||
|P2FL='''(FL)''' | |||
|WC=194 | |||
|Notes=Turn A articles cannot have any first linked data and have no back link requirement.}} | |||
==Additional Links== | |||
Links to others' Phantoms: | |||
* [[One:Batavia Excession]] | |||
* [[One:Excessions]] | |||
==Discussion== | |||
The most common explanations I have heard for the Antarctic Superposition is that it was in fact ''caused by'' the Tertiary Excession. I greatly respect Alt Melis' work here (I agree wholeheartedly with the theory of two distinct regions within Dinosaur Valley, for example), and I wonder if the scholar might be able to shed more light on the suggestion that the AS may not be directly linked with Batavia. | The most common explanations I have heard for the Antarctic Superposition is that it was in fact ''caused by'' the Tertiary Excession. I greatly respect Alt Melis' work here (I agree wholeheartedly with the theory of two distinct regions within Dinosaur Valley, for example), and I wonder if the scholar might be able to shed more light on the suggestion that the AS may not be directly linked with Batavia. | ||
[[User:Prof. Reinhold Sanger|Prof. Reinhold Sanger]] 12:20, 20 August 2012 (PDT) | [[User:Prof. Reinhold Sanger|Prof. Reinhold Sanger]] 12:20, 20 August 2012 (PDT) | ||
:Alt Melis frequently uses "between" in an inclusive sense, and did not at this time want to take a stand between the Tertiarian, Quaternarian, and Seperate-Eventian sides of that particular 'controversy'. | |||
:--The lead research assistant of [[User:Alt Melis|Alt Melis]] 13:45, 20 August 2012 (PDT) | |||
::A wise and diplomatic stance, indeed. | |||
::[[User:Prof. Reinhold Sanger|Prof. Reinhold Sanger]] 18:16, 20 August 2012 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:31, 8 September 2012
Article Metadata
{{#ifeq: {{{SourceArt}}} | N/A | |
}}
| Author: | Alt Melis |
| First Linked By: | N/A |
| Turn Link Created: | N/A |
| Article that Created this Link: | Not provided |
| Required Links | |
|---|---|
| Phantom Links | |
| Climatological Flux (FL) | |
| Galbraith Dig (FL) | |
| Article Link | |
| No link | |
| Other Data | |
| Word Count | 194 |
Turn A articles cannot have any first linked data and have no back link requirement.
Additional Links[edit]
Links to others' Phantoms:
Discussion[edit]
The most common explanations I have heard for the Antarctic Superposition is that it was in fact caused by the Tertiary Excession. I greatly respect Alt Melis' work here (I agree wholeheartedly with the theory of two distinct regions within Dinosaur Valley, for example), and I wonder if the scholar might be able to shed more light on the suggestion that the AS may not be directly linked with Batavia.
Prof. Reinhold Sanger 12:20, 20 August 2012 (PDT)
- Alt Melis frequently uses "between" in an inclusive sense, and did not at this time want to take a stand between the Tertiarian, Quaternarian, and Seperate-Eventian sides of that particular 'controversy'.
- --The lead research assistant of Alt Melis 13:45, 20 August 2012 (PDT)
- A wise and diplomatic stance, indeed.
- Prof. Reinhold Sanger 18:16, 20 August 2012 (PDT)
